Russell Brand is not a ‘psychopath who rapes people and thinks it’s normal’, court told
法庭獲悉:拉塞爾·布蘭德並非“認為強奸正常的心理變態”
Defence barrister says earlier allegations about comedian’s sexual conduct ‘poisoned the wells’ of justice as trial continues Russell Brand is not a “psychopath who rapes people and thinks it’s normal” and is respectful when women say no, a court has heard. In his closing speech at Southwark crown court, Brand’s barrister, Ian Winter KC, questioned why Brand’s accusers had not fought back when they were allegedly raped, saying “not one of them resisted or screamed or even tried to leave”. Continue reading...
拉塞爾·布蘭德性侵案庭審中,辯護律師在結案陳詞里質疑原告為何未反抗、未在#MeToo期間報案,並稱Brand尊重女性說“不”。Brand對七項指控均不認罪,案件仍在審理。
這篇庭審報道適合練習作者態度與論證辨析:辯方律師的結案陳詞層層設問,讀者需要區分“律師主張”與“事實陳述”,抓住質疑、反問與引語之間的立場差異。文中多處同義替換(如resist/scream/kick out)和因果推斷(為何未報案、為何行為“正常”)可作為定位與推斷題素材,也能訓練對法庭話語中隱含偏見的敏感度。
來源:The Guardian · theguardian.com