Vox·· 7 小時前精選推薦指數83.12
The Supreme Court sounds eager to make you pay for anti-LGBTQ schools
最高法院似乎急於讓你為反LGBTQ學校買單
導讀
There was one significant surprise during the Supreme Court’s Tuesday argument in St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy, a case asking whether Colorado may require schools that accept state funding to treat LGBTQ families and students the same way they treat anyone else. For a brief moment, Chief Justice John Roberts seemed like he might […]
最高法院就科羅拉多州能否要求接受公共資助的宗教學校不得歧視LGBTQ群體展開辯論,多數大法官傾向於讓宗教學校獲得豁免。若這一立場成為判決,納稅人將被迫資助在法律上本屬違法的歧視行為。
推薦理由
文章以口頭辯論為線索,梳理多位大法官的提問與立場,適合練習人物觀點定位與態度推斷。注意區分羅伯茨的早期提問與最終傾向、巴雷特提出的折中方案,以及三位自由派大法官的假設性反問。文中反復出現 strict scrutiny、exemption 等法律術語,可積累同義替換與因果論證的表達。
來源:Vox · vox.com