Most Israelis think settlements policy should change to avoid more sanctions, poll finds
民調發現:多數以色列人認為定居點政策應改變以避免更多制裁

Survey finds UK government’s decision to impose trade ban was not a decisive factor in how Israelis voted in election The UK government’s decision to impose a ban on trade in goods from illegal settlements was not decisive in how Israelis voted in their general election , but a majority think the Israeli government’s settlements policy should change if it is going to lead to further sanctions, a new poll of Israelis shows. There had been fierce criticism of the UK foreign secretary Ed Miliband’s decision in September to impose a trade ban and wider sanctions on illegal settlements, with some claiming it would drive Israeli voters into the arms of Benjamin Netanyahu. Continue reading...
aChord民調顯示,多數以色列人知曉並區分英國對非法定居點商品的貿易禁令,但該禁令並未明顯影響其投票。約半數受訪者認為應調整定居點政策以避免制裁升級,且當制裁帶來個人經濟代價時,反對現行政策的人更多。
這篇民調報道適合練習數據定位與觀點比較:文中密集出現76%、71%、63%等分組數據,需要區分全體、內塔尼亞胡陣營與“變革”陣營的不同比例。讀者可訓練同義替換(sanctions、trade ban、settlements policy交替出現)和因果推斷,如“個人代價越高越反對定居點政策”這一結論如何從數據推出。作者態度藏在引語與措辭中,可留意對英國禁令“並非決定性”的定性。
來源:The Guardian · theguardian.com